Critical literature review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Critical - Literature review ExampleThis insufficiency of theory based knowledge undoubtedly brings the importance of evidence based discipline and understanding. In the field of medicine, ameliorate is vastly defined. Many authors have not been able to limitise its description and concept within a few representative sentences. This brings the mien of vast dimensions within the process of healing. It is not only linked with the physical parts of human body, but also finds its application in psychology and spiritualism as well. And many researchers have tried to define healing in patients with chronic illness, disability, pain and at the end of life (Kigler, 2004 Marshall et al. 2004 Geller et al., 2004 Cherkin & Sherman, 2004 Waters, 2006 Farber, 2002 Silver, 2004). Additionally, various opposite fields such as nursing and anthropology have also identified it to be a useful part of their practices. As we be critically analysing devil names-Healing in Primary Care A vision s hared out by patients, physicians, nurses and clinical staff and Understanding healing relationship in primary care, it is more(prenominal) appropriate to define healing, which is defined as a multidimensional process with emotional, physical and spiritual dimensions (Hsu et al., 2008). This definition of healing is sufficiently consistent with the healing definition in other literatures (Hsu et al. 2008,Egnew, 2005, Dossey, 2003 Wendler, 1996) Each article has a different summary. In the article Healing in primary care a vision shared by patients, physicians, nurses and clinical staff, the fundamental focus of the focused groups was to obtain understanding of the fundamental concept of healing among patients, physicians, nurses and clinical staff also, what they consider as facilitators and barriers to promoting healing in primary care were discussed. In this article, for the purpose of learning via evidence based, the instrument of focused group is used in which nine focused grou ps were logical with 84 participants, 28 patients, 23 primary care physicians (19 family physicians), 11 licensed practical nurses, 20 registered nurses, and 2 medical assistants. On the other hand, in the article understanding healing relationship in primary care, much emphasis is given to highlight and understand the development and maintenance of healing relationships between patients and clinicians. Here, the order of interview was used to serve the objectives of healing relationships with three processes resulted as fostering healing relationships-valuing non-judgmental emotional bond, working in a way to serve the maximal facilitation for patients and displaying a caring attitude towards patients. Critical evaluation of these articles serves the objectives of this literature review. The methods, data, outcomes and theories enlisted in both articles are going to be made part of this process of judgment with a critical look. Have these two articles really served the way for which they were planned? Have these objectives provided something useful towards the process and practice of healing? These are the fundamental questions are discussed further below. Critical evaluation Healing in primary care A vision shared by patients, physicians, nurses and clinical staff Healing is a fundamental part of medical science, yet its role is insufficiently understood in the modern health care system (Brody, 1992 Lown, 1996 Cassell, 1991). In this article, many